Introduction
In an effort to identify the main barriers to investment funds operating in a Member State other than their own home state and to improve the passport system, the Commission issued a public consultation (the “Consultation”) in June of this year seeking industry views on the cross-border distribution of investment funds. This article considers the background to the Consultation, provides an overview of its content, briefly outlines the response of Irish Funds to the Consultation and provides some concluding remarks.
Background
In support of the creation of a Capital Markets Union (CMU) in the EU, the Consultation builds on this aspect of the green paper by inviting views on policy measures, in the area of cross-border distribution, which could be developed and implemented to streamline the marketing process.
Overview of the Consultation
Feedback was requested from interested parties in the following main areas:
- Marketing requirements of host member states; for example, requirements regarding the content of communications;
- Marketing costs, in terms of costs to comply with regulation and distribution, and regulatory fees;
- Administrative arrangements; for example, a requirement for UCITS to appoint a paying agent located in a host member state;
- Direct and online distribution of investment funds;
- Varying notification processes when competent authorities require to be notified of changes to investment fund documentation; an
- Differential tax treatment.
The consultation period for responses closed during October 2016.
Irish Funds Response
Irish Funds responded to the public consultation by identifying and drawing the attention of the European Commission to some of the barriers to the cross-border distribution of investment funds, including:
- Additional marketing requirements imposed by host member states in which cross-border marketing is taking place;
- Level of regulatory fees imposed by host member states to permit cross-border marketing to take place;
- Differences in the tax reporting requirements of various host member states.
The Irish Funds response also identified potential enhancements to the cross-border marketing process, including:
- Information regarding investment fund registration and marketing requirements in all member states to be maintained online in a central location;
- A uniform registration and annual maintenance process, such as an EU standardised registration form with specific market appendices, to be implemented;
- Removal of any requirement for a local paying agent or information agent when investment funds are being marketed to institutional investors.
Conclusion
It is encouraging that the Commission initiated a public consultation in this area. As a result of the helpful contribution of Irish Funds, and other interested parties, to this debate, it is to be hoped that the Commission leads the development of meaningful measures, which help to reduce barriers to cross-border distribution of investment funds. We await the outcome of the Consultation with interest.
Written by David Naughton for IrishFunds.ie. Autumn 2016 Newsletter: Fund Focus