CJEU Rules Dynamic IP Addresses May Constitute Personal Data
Dynamic IP addresses constitute personal data where an individual can be identified by indirect means
In a decision that may have far
reaching implications for website operators, the Court of Justice of the
European Union (CJEU) has ruled that dynamic IP addresses can constitute
personal data, even where the individual can only be identified using
additional data held by a third party (normally the internet service provider
that assigns the IP address).
Background
Patrick Breyer, a German politician,
sought an injunction preventing the Federal Republic of Germany from storing IP
addresses of visitors to their websites for cyber security
purposes.
The case had reached the highest
court in Germany, which referred two questions to the
CJEU:
- Whether a dynamic IP address held by
an online media service provider could constitute personal data in
circumstances where the additional data necessary to identify the data subject
can only be provided by the internet service provider
- Whether the provision of German law
that precluded a justification based on "legitimate interest" to hold data
(e.g. to prevent cyberattacks) was inconsistent with Article 7 of the Data
Protection Directive (the "Directive")
Court ruling and future
implications
In response to these questions, the
CJEU ruled that:
- A dynamic IP address may constitute
personal data if the site operator has legal means enabling it to identify the
visitor with the help of additional information provided by a third
party
- The provision of German law that
limited the scope of the "legitimate interest" justification by providing that
it only applied to the specific use of the site by the data subject is
inconsistent with Article 7 of the Directive (which creates the
justification)
The decision is likely to present
challenges to online media service providers. If all IP addresses can
constitute personal data, site operators will now need to balance the
fundamental rights of data subjects who access their sites with the legitimate
interest in preventing cyberattacks. This is likely to result in additional
requirements for site operators such as carrying out privacy impact
assessments.
Follow us on Twitter @WFIDEA
Contributed by John
Magee
Back to Legal News